Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Going solid state

I finally decide to invest in a Solid State Hard Drive or SSD and evaluate this technology and its prospects. As regular magnetic hard disk drive (HDD) prices have increased dramatically over the last couple of months, now seemed a good time to do so. I chose a relatively new Kingston 64GB V200 which closely approaches the £1 per Gigabyte limit. This has a modern controller that supports the future-proofing SATA III 6Gbps transfer speed and higher bandwidths for both read and write operations at an affordable and relatively low capacity level.

I considered testing it in three different environments; as a boot drive for a previous generation, fast quad core system; as a replacement drive for my DELL Vostro i5 Core laptop; and as a data drive for my gaming system. I installed Windows 7 on it in the first environment and though it improved boot times dramatically, though installing applications seemed a lot slower and general use about the same. This meant that I didn't replace the already fast 7,200rpm hard disk drive in my laptop because I didn't really see the point. It was fast enough and worked well already. Not worth the effort.

My gaming system already has 190GB used of the 500Gb system hard drive so the SSD wasn't going to replace that easily. I decided to add it as a game drive that I can fill at my leisure and will improve game start-up an level loading times. I'll report back on my findings.

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

My cloud concerns

I'm worried about all this excitement about cloud computing. It seems to be returning to the bad old days of the IT industry when dumb terminals were connected to a big mainframe computer. This held all your data and there were strict rules on how you accesses it and used it.

I agree connectivity is different now but still some issues remain:

- Who owns your data? What happens when the cloud wants to increase their charges for data storage and application use.
- The software companies want to charge a monthly subscription which eases their cash flow problems, but costs you a lot more in the long run.
- Web browsers and applications seem unreliable, inconsistent and downright fallible.
- Uploads speeds are often a large factor slower than download speeds. Try backing up a single Gigabyte to the cloud on a typical domestic broadband connection.
- Extra levels of data vulnerability and security. Another password/PIN/memorable phrase to remember.

I'm typing this in a Chrome browser window because with Internet Explorer the Publish button does not work. It used to and I've reset the browser but it is still broken. And what if I'd been two hours typing this document or creating a killer presentation. Giving control away is not always the answer.

Sunday, November 20, 2011

A neat and affordable Home Server

I recently bought a Fujitsu Primergy MX130 small server. It only cost £250 from serversdirect.co.uk that came already loaded with an AMD Athlon II dual core CPU, 2Gb of ECC memory and two 250Gb hard disk drives. With disk drive prices as they are now if I don't sell the unit shortly, I could always use the hard disk drives as spares. I tried loading a cheap (£35) copy of Microsoft's Windows Home Server 2011 to see what it looked like. Installation went well and I configured the two disk drives as RAID 1 (mirror) without any problems.

Microsoft has really 'thrown the baby out with the bath water' with this latest version of WHS. Not only do you have no Drive Extender but also shared folders cannot be replicated like they used to. This is what saved me earlier in the year when one of the drives failed on my own DELL Home Server. I suppose for just £35, it is good value in software terms as it basically includes Windows Server 2008 R2 with client PC and server backup.

The Fujitsu server hardware is superb for the price. It is small and quiet yet surprisingly powerful. Also worth noting is the 85% efficient power supply unit. There is not much expansion room for more disk drives though. So, if I do sell the 250Gb drives separately, I will replace them with much bigger ones when the prices become more reasonable again.

Anyway, if you want a neat and proper Windows Home or Small Business Essentials Server for under £300, I'd recommend this configuration.

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Hard Disk Drive prices triple

The flooding in Bangkok, Thailand where a factory which makes components for hard disk drives has been affected and caused global prices of these components to soar in the last week. They appear to be up to three times what they were previously and this is having problems both for computer manufacturers and for people like myself who repair computers.

I don't keep much stock of these commodity items, generally purchasing exact replacements for the computers who need these items due to hard disk drive crashes, a not unlikely event. This makes the repairs often uneconomically viable especially if a new copy of Windows needs to be purchased as well due to no recovery disc creation and no CDs in the box so to speak. Add at least a couple of hours of my labour and you almost approach the price of a new laptop.

I also see that computer manufacturers are also increasing their prices quickly, though they must have a reasonable stock of drives.

Another effect is the decision whether to use an SSD in a new PC build. The speed benefit is huge and the price difference is now reduced, so if you don't need a large capacity from day one then the SSD option is much more attractive. You can always add a hard disk drive later when presumably the prices are more reasonable.

It is amazing how quickly the prices have gone through the roof as the suppliers take advantage of the panic in the market. Imagine if car prices did the same.

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Vista laptops

I've had a series of laptops in for repair, all running Windows Vista, all about three years old and really slow and all failing with a variety of problems. What is going on?

They take ages to repair much more than I can reasonably charge the client for. Most have just 1Gb of memory and need all the accumulated programs removing from the start-up list before you can get any reasonable response from them. Running an anti-virus scan on them can take hours and I certainly can't do anything else at the same time. Windows Update won't run and I often need to manually load Service Packs. Even rebooting them takes ages. And all run very warm.

I suppose that they have all reached the end of their useful life, yet with our present economic climate people cannot afford to replace them.

I'm gradually working my way through the backlog.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Getting the best bang for the buck

With the release of the new Intel 'Sandy Bridge' Pentium and Celeron and AMD Llano CPUs come new options in the low-end or value segment of the processor market. Assuming that CPU performance is directly related to overall system performance by ignoring other factors such as memory, storage, graphics etc., we strive to create the best 'bang for the buck' desktop systems using these essential components.

In reality, there is very little overall system performance difference for any of these CPUs based on a different architectures and motherboards. Indeed in a recent comparative test of generations of these architectures less than 25% of general performance separated the oldest and latest. It isn't until the mid-range performance where great differences are noticed such as the Intel Core i5-2500K when it is suitably overclocked. Then personal desire seems to take preference over necessity. DIY and bespoke system builders take advantage of this. The mainstream PC manufacturers mostly take the easy option of standard configurations. DELL is perhaps the odd one out here with its XPS and Alienware brands.

The variation in performance in the dual-core Socket AM3, FM1, LGA1155, LGA1156 and LGA775 CPUs is fairly minimal as is their quad-core versions. Bargains can be had by taking a £50 processor overclocking it by 20% (no expensive cooling solutions here) and by unlocking a core or two as well. They st

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Windows XP R.I.P.

I've had a steady number of requests for Windows XP on a new system. I've had to tell them that it is no longer available from DELL or any other manufacturer or retailer and apart from a few 'dodgy' copies on eBaY that's it. No more.

I then try to sell them on the benefits of the new Windows 7 over an operating system that was designed over 15 years ago, sold for the last 10 years, no longer supported from Microsoft for consumers, etc. It generally comes down to two excuses as to why they want it; I'm used to Windows XP and don't want to change (usually an elderly customer); or my business critical application only runs on Windows XP or IE6. For the latter I argue if it is business critical either buy the updated version or switch to an application that is supported for Windows 7 and the future. With a lot of pirated software in the small business segment these become hard lessons to learn.

There are exceptions, such as Lotus Organiser. This little application won the hearts and minds of users many years ago and though it has been discontinued by IBM it is sorely missed and there is a limited upgrade path to any similar application. If anyone has the source code and could develop a similar product for a reasonable cost they would have a winner.

So the end is nigh for Windows XP, but I dare say I will still be 'fixing' it for a few years yet on old DELL, Compaq, Time, Acer, etc. systems to prove what an enduring bit of software it really is.