 I've just upgraded a system from a Pentium 4 3GHz to a 'cheap as chips' Celeron E3200 (see previous posts) and what a difference it has made.  Both these CPUs were slightly overclocked by 15% to 3.3GHz and 2.77Ghz respectively.  Some preliminary testing showed that the integer performance has gone from 8,017 to 21,179 (Sisoft Sandra Arithmetic), an almost threefold amount.
I've just upgraded a system from a Pentium 4 3GHz to a 'cheap as chips' Celeron E3200 (see previous posts) and what a difference it has made.  Both these CPUs were slightly overclocked by 15% to 3.3GHz and 2.77Ghz respectively.  Some preliminary testing showed that the integer performance has gone from 8,017 to 21,179 (Sisoft Sandra Arithmetic), an almost threefold amount.I view the more general PCmark05 type of benchmark as more representative measurement of a system's responsiveness however. It shows weaknesses and bottlenecks in a systems configuration. Here then the difference was even more amazing from 2,280 to 6,328. Again an almost threefold improvement. Just by changing a CPU to one of the cheapest modern ones available.
I used to think that adding memory to a PC was the easiest and most cost effective way of improving an older system's performance. The computer equivalent of a mid-life upgrade. Though it is still effective upgrade, memory costs have gone up considerably in the last few months and now a cheap dual core CPU upgrade to those Socket 775 systems looks an even more effective alternative.
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment